MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133243209

Bezpieczeństwo wewnętrzne państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej: od bezpieczeństwa państwa do bezpieczeństwa ludzi (Internal Security of the European Union Member States: From Security of States to Safety of People)

2012· article· pl· W3133243209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karina Paulina Marczuk

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal securityHuman securityPolitical scienceEuropean unionHumanitiesPublic administrationPoliticsLawBusinessEconomic policyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polish Abstract: Tematem, ktoremu poświecono te ksiązke, jest pojmowanie bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego przez panstwa bedące czlonkami Unii Europejskiej. Starano sie wykazac, czy i w jakim zakresie wplyw na rozumienie bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego mają dwa glowne nurty human security, czyli szeroki, zwany szkolą japonską („wolnośc od ubostwa”), koncentrujący sie na zaspakajaniu podstawowych ludzkich potrzeb oraz wąski, tzw. szkola kanadyjska, postulujący „wolnośc od zagrozen”, a zatem zagwarantowanie praw i wolności obywatelskich oraz bezpieczenstwo osobiste. Rozdzial pierwszy zostal poświecony rozwazaniom teoretycznym na temat bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego oraz human security; tym samym rozdzial ten stanowi wprowadzenie do metodologii badan bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego oraz bezpieczenstwa ludzkiego. Kolejne rozdzialy (II–IV) zawierają studia przypadkow panstw czlonkowskich kolejnych rozszerzen Unii Europejskiej w zakresie pojmowania przez nie bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego (rozdzial II) oraz szerokiego (rozdzial III) i wąskiego (rozdzial IV) zakresu human security w czasach wspolczesnych, czyli po zimnej wojnie. W ostatnim, piątym rozdziale pracy skupiono sie natomiast na pojmowaniu przez Unie Europejską bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego, biorąc pod uwage wplyw zakresow szerokiego i wąskiego human security. English Abstract: The understanding of internal security in the post-Cold War period considerably differs from the perception of the concept prevailing in the previous era. The qualitative change in the meaning of internal security has been caused by many factors of both intra-state as well as – paradoxically – international character. However, internal security is understood in different ways in various states because of their history and traditions, political and legal systems, current policies in internal affairs etc., and also due to their membership in international organizations. In particular, the European Union (EU) member states had to adopt an approach to internal security which has been evolving during the last two decades because of the impact of solutions implemented by the EU in the field of internal security. Another very important factor is the boom of alternative concepts of security after the end of the Cold War which are moving away from the traditional, state-security paradigm towards new subjects of security – e.g. the ecosystem (environmental security), social groups (societal security) and, finally, the individual human being (human security). It is the concept of human security that has become well-established, firstly in the policies of the United Nations (UN), and more recently within the European Union, as well. The topic of this volume is the understanding of internal security in states that are members of the European Union. A particular interest of the analysis has been the question to what extent the concept of human security has influenced the current perception of internal security. There are two main concepts of human security, which are widely known as the Japanese school (“freedom from want”), a broad approach, focused on meeting basic human needs, and the narrower approach of the so-called Canadian school, postulating “freedom from fear”, i.e. protection of rights and civil liberties as well as personal safety. In this volume the impact of both these concepts of human security on the meaning of internal security is explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicEuropean Politics and SecurityFrench-language works237,207