Coupled iron reduction-ammonium oxidation (Feammox) in alkaline soils polluted with nitrogen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although nitrogen fertilizers help stimulate plant and microbial growth in N-limited soils, the use of excess N fertilizers to improve agricultural yield in Canada can cause adverse side effects of groundwater and surface water pollution, greenhouse gas production, soil acidification, and human health issues. Two N-removal pathways currently used to treat N-polluted wastewater and groundwater include denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox). This study explored a novel anaerobic N-removal pathway that converts ammonium (NH4+) to inert nitrogen gas (N2) or nitrite (NO2-) while reducing Fe(III) to Fe(II), a.k.a. iron ammonium oxidation (Feammox) via a 118-day anaerobic incubation which included four sequential biostimulation experiments. The goal of the incubation was to identify Feammox in neutral-alkaline soil samples from a N-polluted site in Alberta by stimulating the bioremediation of NH4+. This was done amending the soils with vitamins and sources of NH4+ and Fe(III). The treatments for the anaerobic controls and soil slurries included one or more of the following: ammonium chloride (A), 2-line ferrihydrite (FH), and ferric citrate (FC). Amendments were added to these treatments in four sequential Feammox biostimulation experiments: 1) FC, FH, and A, 2) FC and FH, 3) FC and A, and 4) vitamin and molybdate solutions. The soil slurry with ferric citrate and NH4Cl amendments (S-FCA) had the most notable dissolved NH4+-N loss during the 118-day incubation, particularly when FC and A were added concurrently, i.e. a decrease of 14 ± 1.7 mg L-1 dissolved NH4+-N in the first experiment and a decrease of 13 ± 6.5 mg L-1 dissolved NH4+-N in the third experiment. S-FCA also exhibited signs of Fe(III) reduction throughout the incubation. In the incubation all samples generated minimal dissolved NO2- (0-2 mg L-1). Following the 118-day incubation the S-FCA treatment was subcultured to reproduce results; however, the subcultures did not show notable NH4+ loss, possibly due to dilution or N mineralization. Overall, this study showed a correlation between concurrent ferric citrate and NH4Cl amendments and dissolved NH4+-N loss in near-neutral anaerobic conditions; however, it did not provide clear evidence of Feammox. Additional experiments are necessary to isolate Feammox.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".