Effects of hypoxia on the respiratory and metabolic responses to progressive cooling in newborn rodents that range in heterothermic expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Adult homeotherms and heterotherms differ in cold and hypoxia tolerance and in how they match O2 supply and demand in response to these stressors. It has never been ascertained whether these differences reflect different developmental trajectories or whether they are already present at birth. What is the main finding and its importance? When exposed to cold and hypoxia, newborn rodents differed in how they matched O2 supply and demand, with responses reflecting the degree of heterothermic expression and tolerance. Our findings indicate that elements of the adult phenotype are already present at birth. Abstract There are physiological differences in how adult rodents regulate O2 supply and O2 demand when exposed to hypoxia in the cold. We examined whether these differences reflect divergent developmental trajectories of homeotherms and heterotherms or whether the differences are already present at birth. We exposed newborn rodents (0–4 days old) that ranged in heterothermic expression [a homeotherm, the rat (Rattus norvegicus); two facultative heterotherms, the mouse (Mus musculus) and the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus); and an obligate heterotherm, the ground squirrel (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus)] to either normoxia (21% O2) or hypoxia (7% O2) and measured their metabolic, thermoregulatory and ventilatory responses while progressively reducing the ambient temperature from 33 to 15°C. All newborns reduced their body temperature, O2 consumption rate and ventilation during progressive cooling, both in normoxia and in hypoxia. When progressively cooled in hypoxia, however, the homeothermic rats exhibited the greatest thermogenic response, depressed their O2 consumption rate the least and increased ventilation the most. In contrast, the obligate heterotherm, the ground squirrel, did not mount a thermogenic response, exhibited the greatest reduction in O2 consumption rate and increased O2 uptake not by increasing ventilation like the rat, but by extracting ≤80% of the O2 from each breath. Facultative heterotherms (mice and hamsters) exhibited responses in between these two extreme phenotypes. We conclude that even as newborns, homeotherms and heterotherms diverge in how they match O2 supply and O2 demand when progressively cooled in hypoxia, with responses reflecting the degree of heterothermic expression, in addition to reported hypoxia and cold tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".