Effect of oxidized β-carotene on the growth and feed efficiency of broilers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fully oxidized β-carotene (OxBC) containing β-carotene-oxygen copolymers is proposed as an alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters. Two trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of OxBC in enhancing growth and feed intake (FI) in male and female Ross × Ross 308 broilers in Ontario, Canada, and in Ross 308 male broilers in the United Kingdom. In the first trial, 0, 1, 2, or 5 ppm OxBC were added to diets in a 20% cornstarch premix, whereas in the second trial, 0, 2, or 5 ppm OxBC were added in a 1% cornstarch or 1% corncob grits premix. In trial 1, 2, and 5 ppm OxBC improved bird final body weights (BW) compared with the unsupplemented, nonmedicated (no bacitracin methylene disalicylate included), negative control birds after 39 d of feeding under commercial conditions (P < 0.05). All levels of OxBC improved feed conversion (FCR) during the finisher period (P < 0.05), whereas 2 and 5 ppm OxBC enhanced FCR relative to the negative control group during the full production cycle (P < 0.05). Average daily FI was not affected by OxBC, whereas 2 and 5 ppm OxBC increased broiler average daily gain (ADG) (P < 0.05). Oxidized β-carotene did not affect bird mortality. The optimal OxBC dose was 2 ppm under the conditions used. In trial 2, 2 or 5 ppm OxBC on cornstarch and 5 ppm OxBC on corncob grits improved ADG, BW, and FI when fed for 35 d, as compared with the negative, nonmedicated control (P < 0.05). Feed conversion was not improved in the OxBC groups compared with the control group (P > 0.05). There were no differences among the 3 OxBC groups (P > 0.05). When birds were fed 2 ppm OxBC on corncob grits, the overall ADG, BW, and FI were lower than the respective control values (P < 0.001). Overall bird mortality was higher than expected for all groups, including the control group, but no dose effect was evident. Cornstarch was the preferred carrier for OxBC, and 2 ppm OxBC was the optimal dose under the conditions used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".