Sex effects on cortical morphological networks in healthy young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding sex-related differences across the human cerebral cortex is an important step in elucidating the basis of psychological, behavioural and clinical differences between the sexes. Prior structural neuroimaging studies primarily focused on regional sex differences using univariate analyses. Here we focus on sex differences in cortical morphological networks (CMNs) derived using multivariate modelling of regional cortical measures of volume and surface from high-quality structural MRI scans from healthy participants in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) (n = 1,063) and the Southwest University Longitudinal Imaging Multimodal (SLIM) study (n = 549). The functional relevance of the CMNs was inferred using the NeuroSynth decoding function. Sex differences were widespread but not uniform. In general, females had higher volume, thickness and cortical folding in networks that involve prefrontal (both ventral and dorsal regions including the anterior cingulate) and parietal regions while males had higher volume, thickness and cortical folding in networks that primarily include temporal and posterior cortical regions. CMN loading coefficients were used as input features to linear discriminant analyses that were performed separately in the HCP and SLIM; sex was predicted with a high degree of accuracy (81%-85%) across datasets. The availability of behavioral data in the HCP enabled us to show that male-biased surface-based CMNs were associated with externalizing behaviors. These results extend previous literature on regional sex-differences by identifying CMNs that can reliably predict sex, are relevant to the expression of psychopathology and provide the foundation for the future investigation of their functional significance in clinical populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".