MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133789524 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.043

A45 A NOVEL PH-SENSITIVE OPIOID ANALGESIC THAT SELECTIVELY INHIBITS NOCICEPTION IN DSS-INDUCED COLITIS

2021· article· en· W3133789524 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Yu, Nestor N. Jiménez-Vargas, Quentin Tsang, Cristina López López, J Jaramillo Polanco, Christoph Stein, Alan Lomax, David E. Reed, Nigel W. Bunnett, Stephen Vanner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNociceptionInflammatory bowel diseaseColitisOpioidPharmacologyVisceral painMedicineAnesthesiaChemistryAnalgesicIn vivoInternal medicineReceptorBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Opioid drugs are used to treat pain in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but their side effects can cause serious morbidity. Therefore, we tested a novel opioid analgesic, ±)-N-(3-fluoro-1-phenethylpiperidine-4-yl)-N-phenylpropionamide (NFEPP) which selectively activates peripheral µ-opioid receptors at acidic pH, as occurs in inflamed tissue. Aims Evaluate whether NFEPP causes analgesia in the inflamed colon of DSS-colitis mice using both in vitro and in vivo techniques. Methods To measure the visceral motor reflex (VMR) in response to colorectal distention, EMG electrodes connected to a telemetric transmitter were implanted in mice (c57BL/6), after 10 days recovery acute dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis was induced (5 days 2.5% DSS, 2 days water). VMR was measured 30 min after s.c. injection of vehicle or 0.2 mg/kg of NFEPP or fentanyl. Motility was assessed by fecal pellet count 1 hour after NFEPP. Colonic tissue pH was evaluated using the SNARF-4F-5 carboxylic acid probe. Excitability of mouse dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons was measured by recording the rheobase (minimum input current to fire an action potential) after superfusion of NFEPP (300 nM, 10 min) or vehicle at pH 6.5 or 7.4. Colonic afferent nerve responses to probing with a von Frey filament (1 gm) were examined before and after exposure to NFEPP (300 nM, 5 min superfusion) at pH 6.5 and 7.4 respectively. The data was analyzed with Welch’s t-test, 1- or 2-way ANOVA with post hoc Dunnett or Bonferroni or Tukey’s test. Results NFEPP significantly inhibited the VMR in response to distension in mice with colitis compared to vehicle (decreased response by 65%, P<0.001). NFEPP had no effect in control mice. Conversely, fentanyl caused a similar decreased response in both groups (DSS 79% and control 67%, P<0.001). Pelleting was not affected by NFEPP injection in either group compared to vehicle. The pH measurement revealed a more acidic environment in DSS colonic tissue (ΔpH0.37±0.14, P<0.05) compared to controls. In patch-clamp studies, NFEPP decreased DRG excitability at pH 6.5 compared to the baseline and vehicle (increased rheobase 53.84%, P<0.01 and 36.36%, P<0.05 respectively) but had no effect at pH 7.4. In colonic afferent nerve recordings, NFEPP significantly attenuated afferent responses (28.9% P<0.01) to probing at pH 6.5 but also had no effect at pH 7.4. Conclusions This pH-selective opioid agonist significantly inhibits pain at the site of inflammation where the tissue pH is acidic but has no effect in tissues where the pH is in the physiological range. Thus, NFEPP could be an effective opioid analgesic in IBD while being devoid of any unwanted side effects. Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207