MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3133789939 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.096

A98 DEFINING TRANSITION SUCCESS ACCORDING TO YOUNG ADULTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2021· article· en· W3133789939 on OpenAlexaffabout
Allison Bihari, Nurkholis Hamidi, Cynthia H. Seow, Karen J. Goodman, Eytan Wine, Karen I. Kroeker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisInflammatory bowel diseaseQualitative researchMedical diagnosisMedicineNonprobability samplingTransitional careFamily medicineDiseaseHealth carePsychologyInternal medicinePathologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The incidence of childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnoses is increasing in Canada; therefore, more patients will need to transition from pediatric into adult care. The literature on transition in IBD patients has focused mainly on preparation and while transition success is often referenced, it is not clearly defined. Prior research on IBD transition success has only focused on the perspectives of the health care providers. Taking into consideration that transition is a process that greatly relies on patient involvement, patient perspectives should be represented in defining its success. Aims The primary aim is to understand patients’ perspectives on the outcomes that characterize a successful transition from pediatric to adult care. Methods This study paired a theoretical position of naturalistic inquiry with the method of qualitative description. Purposive sampling was used to recruit patients from IBD clinics at the University of Alberta and the University of Calgary. Inclusion criteria included transition within the last two years, diagnoses with IBD for at least a year prior to transitioning, and absence of comorbidities. Virtual semi-structured interviews were conducted using an established interview guide. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed concurrently with data collection by latent content analysis using NVivo computer software. Participant recruitment and data analysis continued until no further themes emerged from the data, which signaled that thematic saturation was achieved. Results Thematic saturation was achieved after 17 interviews. Among participants, 58.8% were female; 47% had a diagnosis of Crohn’s, 47% of ulcerative colitis, and one individual was diagnosed with both. The median age at diagnosis was 15 years (IQR, 3.5). The majority (94%) of participants viewed their transition as being successful. Overall, the major themes that emerged from the data were: 1. relationship with one’s adult care team, characterized predominantly as the patient being comfortable with their new team; 2. health outcomes, characterized by disease remaining stable, and medication adherence; 3. independence in one’s care, characterized by making and attending appointments on their own, asking questions and in general having an awareness about your health and disease; 4. care stability, characterized by no drop off in care, and regular contact and follow up by their provider. Conclusions Young adults with IBD define pediatric transition success in four themes: relationship with care team, health outcomes, independence in one’s care, and care stability. Through understanding what transition success looks like from the patients’ perspectives, health care providers can help patients achieve success as they define it. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→