MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3133799592 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.183

A185 THE IMPACT OF PRIOR SURGERY ON ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN PREGNANT PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

2021· article· en· W3133799592 on OpenAlexaff
Roxana Chis, P Tandon, Vivian Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisInflammatory bowel diseaseProctocolectomyColectomyPregnancyAnastomosisIleostomySurgeryRetrospective cohort studyCohortDiseaseObstetricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background During the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), approximately 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 80% of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients will require surgery. The most common operation is total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) for UC patients and ileocecal (IC) resection for CD. In pregnant IBD patients, guidelines name the presence of IPAA as a relative indication for Cesarean section (C-section). The effect of prior IBD-related surgery on mode of delivery and pregnancy-related outcomes remains unknown. Aims To describe pregnancy-related outcomes in pregnant women with IBD who have undergone prior IBD-related surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with IBD including those with prior IBD-related surgeries including IPAA, IC resection, total or partial colectomy and ileostomy formation who delivered an infant at our medical center from 2016 to 2020. We assessed the mode of delivery, delivery characteristics (emergency vs. planned C-section) and maternal and neonatal outcomes Results Fifty-six UC patients and 64 CD patients were included in the analysis, of which 10 and 24 had undergone prior IBD-related surgery, respectively. The mean age at conception was 34.10 years in the surgical UC group and 30.30 years in the surgical CD group. Mode of delivery: C-section rates were higher in post-surgical compared to non-surgical UC patients (70% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.02). Similar numbers of C-sections were performed emergently in the surgical compared to non-surgical UC group (10% vs. 18%, p = 0.53). Comparatively, there was no significant difference in C-section rates in post -surgical compared to non-surgical CD mothers (50% vs. 40%, p = 0.44), with 13% performed emergently in both groups. Maternal outcomes: Gestational diabetes developed in 10% of surgical UC and 4.5% of surgical CD patients. Premature rupture of membranes developed in 10% of surgical UC and 9.1% of surgical CD patients. There was no difference in pre-eclampsia rates in the surgical and non-surgical CD groups (9.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.64). Neonatal outcomes: There was no significant difference in pre-term birth rates in post-surgical compared to non-surgical UC mothers (10% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.67) or in surgical compared to non-surgical CD mothers (13.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.29). Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) requirements were higher in infants born to post-surgical CD compared to non-surgical CD mothers (18.2% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.04). More low birth weight (LBW) infants were born to post-surgical CD vs non-surgical CD mothers (13.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.02). Conclusions Women with IBD who have had prior IBD-related surgery may be at increased risk of developing adverse gestational and neonatal outcomes. Women with surgical UC have an increased incidence of Cesarean delivery. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→