Development of dual junction GaInP/GaAs solar cells for high-performance concentrator photovoltaic quad-junction III-V/IV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of III-V and group IV compounds in the same heterostructure is of great interest for high performances solar cells under concentration. In fact, the combination of these III-V and group IV compounds can lead to interesting strategic bandgap choices and engineering to better match the absorption of the solar spectrum, and therefore better solar cell performance. The series-connected quad-junctions (4J) solar cell strategies have the potential to improve solar cells performance and therefore enable low-cost concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) systems, allowing lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) from a CPV system. This work presents the investigation of the performance of dual junction (2J) GaInP/GaAs that might be implemented as upper cells with group IV (SiGeSn) cells as bottom cells. The aim of this study is to validate the epitaxial structure and the fabrication process for future 4J cells development. Pitch is varied from 125 μm to 400 μm for two different size of cells, in order to optimize solar cells performance under concentration (X) In the range of 100X to 1000X. Solar cells demonstrated high fill factor (FF) values and ideality factors (n) approaching unity per subcell have been obtained in the range of 100X to 500X. A FF of 85% and 88% are obtained at a concentration of 1000X for the bigger and smaller cells respectively, for the narrowest pitch. These results close to the state-of-the-art are encouraging for the implementation of this 2J with IV bottom subcell for the purpose of high performance 4J.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".