Impact of treatment and frailty on elder-relevant physical function outcomes in older adults with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
76 Background: Maintenance of physical function is a key consideration in treatment decision-making for older adults with metastatic cancer, many of whom are frail. However, physical function outcomes with treatment, and effects of frailty, have not been adequately explored in the mCRPC setting. We evaluated the effects of frailty status and treatment with docetaxel (CHEMO), abiraterone (ABI), enzalutamide (ENZA), and radium 223 (RAD) on elder-relevant physical function outcomes in older men with mCRPC. Methods: Men aged 65+ were enrolled in this multicenter prospective observational cohort study. Daily function was evaluated with the OARS instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Objective physical function was assessed by grip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Falls were documented during interviews. We also collected FACT-G physical well-being (PWB) and functional well-being (FWB) subscales. Assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. We identified frailty status with a validated frailty index. Mixed effects regression models were used to examine the difference in primary outcomes over time by treatment group or frailty status adjusted for baseline characteristics. Factors associated with falls within 6 months of treatment initiation were determined with logistic regression. Results: A total of 70, 38, 67, and 23 men starting CHEMO, ABI, ENZA, and RAD were included. Mean age, education, race, number of medications, and BMI were similar at baseline between treatment groups. In treatment-stratified analyses without considering frailty, no significant changes over time were reported for any physical function outcome. Frailty was significantly associated with lower IADL function (p < 0.0001), worse grip strength (p < 0.0001), worse SPPB score (p < 0.0001), worse PWB (p < 0.0001), and worse FWB (p < 0.0001) at baseline. In frailty-stratified analyses, grip strength (p = 0.0345) worsened, but SPPB (p = 0.0147) improved significantly over time. Also, changes in SPPB (p = 0.0394) and PWB scores (p = 0.0269) over time differed by frailty status, where frail cohorts had greater improvement over time in both scores. Frailty and treatment type were not predictors of falls whereas prior falls history (OR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.40-8.86) and age (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14) were significant predictors. Conclusions: Frail older men receiving treatment for mCRPC have worse IADL function, grip strength, SPPB scores, PWB, and FWB at baseline. Although grip strength worsened over time, they had greater improvement in SPPB scores and PWB over time than fit patients. Contrary to our hypothesis, most older adults do not experience significant worsening in elder-relevant physical function outcomes over time regardless of treatment. The impact of frailty requires further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".