Secure Data Sharing With Flexible User Access Privilege Update in Cloud-Assisted IoMT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud-assisted Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is becoming an emerging paradigm in the healthcare domain, which involves collection, storage and usage of the medical data. Considering the confidentiality and accessibility of the outsourced data, secure and fine-grained data sharing is a crucial requirement for the patients. Attribute-based encryption (ABE) is a promising solution to deal with this issue, but considering its property of each attribute sharing with multiple users, how to flexibly and efficiently update access privileges of certain users without affecting others is still a serious challenge. In this article, we propose a secure and fine-grained data sharing scheme with flexible user access privilege update in cloud-assisted IoMT environment. Specifically, we take ABE as the basic building block, and utilize proxy re-encryption and key blinding techniques to empower the cloud server to re-encrypt the ciphertext affected by revocation and update keys for unrevoked users. In addition, adding attributes for users to extend their access rights is realized only based on few key components stored in cloud without entirely re-computing and re-issuing keys for them. As a result, the patients are able to flexibly and efficiently share their data and manage users’ privileges. Formal proof and detailed performance evaluation demonstrate the security and efficiency of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".