Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the growing concern of increased water levels due to climate change, an interest in developing float homes has arisen. Examining case studies shown in British Columbia, where float home developments are common, it can be noted that float homes can be a successful investment. In British Columbia, the standard base construction is made of Styrofoam encased with reinforced concrete. This assures that the homes will not sink due to the deterioration of the reinforcement in the concrete. The European standard is to have open hull areas with which the home is built upon. It is critical to design an open hull base to improve the usage of space within the home. By incorporating an open hull there is additional storage space, room for mechanical equipment, and improved ballast in the structure. This paper aims to document the development of an Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC) prototype for the float foundations. Working in partnership with FDN Engineering, the objective of Facca Incorporated is to design and develop a foundation based on European examples. Facca Incorporated currently owns marina property that they intend to make into a float home community. The objective is to construct a prototype in 2019 and subject it to the ice conditions in Ontario, Canada. This paper will examine the history of float home construction and how UHPC can alleviate many of the problems the float homes are subject to.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".