Level of Satisfaction of the Practical Studies Teachers with the Distance Education Experience in Kuwait in Light of the CoronaVirus COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers with the distance education experience in Kuwait in light of the coronavirus covid-19 pandemic. To achieve that, the researchers used the survey method. It was applied on a sample of (120) male and female practical studies’ teachers in Mubarak Al-Kabeer governorate in the first semester of the academic year 2020/2021. The researchers built a questionnaire consisting of (20) items to measure the level of their satisfaction with the distance learning experience, and verifying its validity and reliability. The results of the study showed that the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers with the distance education experience in Kuwait was moderate. The results also revealed that there are no statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) in the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers due to the gender variable. While there are statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) in the level of satisfaction due to the variable of educational experience and in favor of who hold an experience with less than (5) years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".