Level of Satisfaction of the Practical Studies Teachers with the Distance Education Experience in Kuwait in Light of the CoronaVirus COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers with the distance education experience in Kuwait in light of the coronavirus covid-19 pandemic. To achieve that, the researchers used the survey method. It was applied on a sample of (120) male and female practical studies’ teachers in Mubarak Al-Kabeer governorate in the first semester of the academic year 2020/2021. The researchers built a questionnaire consisting of (20) items to measure the level of their satisfaction with the distance learning experience, and verifying its validity and reliability. The results of the study showed that the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers with the distance education experience in Kuwait was moderate. The results also revealed that there are no statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) in the level of satisfaction of the practical studies’ teachers due to the gender variable. While there are statistically significant differences at (α = 0.05) in the level of satisfaction due to the variable of educational experience and in favor of who hold an experience with less than (5) years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".