Design application and verification of equivalent static wind loads in bridge design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Kruunuvuori Bridge is new link to connect Laajasalo area to the Helsinki city center by crossing a Kruunuvuorenselkä bay. It’s a cable stayed bridge with a single pylon and symmetric span arrangement, designed to be built with free cantilever method. For such a structure, wind is a governing load for the construction and for the final stage.</p><p>In the Engineering design of the bridge, equivalent static wind load (ESWL) extraction was used to define the action forces for the structures due to the wind. With the applied method it is possible to include crucial frequency-dependent parameters like statistical wind turbulence parameters; aerodynamic damping; aerodynamic admittances and modal coupling into the design. Skew wind angles could also be defined. Such loads are easy to apply with general commercial software and the workflow for the design is practical. As the method itself is not standardized and includes specialist defined parameters, it requires an additional verification. This paper describes how the static equivalent wind loads were applied in the design and how the results were verified with full-aeroelastic model wind tunnel testing. As a conclusion, static wind load extraction provides reliable results and is a practical approach for bridge design under skew winds.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".