MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134275143 · doi:10.1364/ol.415975

Transparent capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer lineararrays for combined realtime optical and ultrasonic imaging

2021· article· en· W3134275143 on OpenAlexafffund
Afshin Kashani Ilkhechi, Christopher Ceroici, Eric B. Dew, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Cancer Society
KeywordsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersUltrasonic sensorTransducerMaterials scienceUltrasoundOpticsCapacitive sensingAcousticsOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transparent ultrasound transducers could enable many novel applications involving both ultrasonics and optics. Recently, we reported transparent capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers (CMUTs) and demonstrated through-illumination photoacoustic imaging. This work presents the feasibility of transparent CMUTs for combined ultrasound imaging and through-array white-light imaging with a miniature camera placed behind the array. Transparent CMUT devices are fabricated with an adhesive wafer bonding technique and provide high transparency up to 90% in visible wavelengths. Fabricated linear arrays have a central operating frequency of 9 MHz with 128 active elements. Realtime plane-wave imaging is performed for ultrasound imaging, and lateral and axial resolutions of, respectively, 234 and 338 µm are achieved. Transparent CMUT has demonstrated a high transmit sensitivity of 1.4 kPa/V per channel with a 100 VDC bias voltage. The signal-to-noise ratio for a beamformed image of wire targets is determined to be 28.4 dB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of combined realtime optical and ultrasonic imaging with transparent arrays. This technology may enable one to visually see what is being scanned and scan what one sees without co-registration errors. Future applications could include multi-modality probes for interventional and surgical procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207