KAJIAN PENERAPAN REGULATOR TEKANAN RENDAH BERDASARKAN SNI 7369:2012
Bibliographic record
Abstract
kesesuaian produk regulator tekanan rendah yang telah beredar dipasaran dengan standar SNI 7369:2012, melalui pengambilan contoh produk di pasaran dan dilakukan proses uji terhadap produk regulator tersebut.Telah dilakukan pengujian produk SNI wajib yaitu uji unjuk kerja dan konstruksi pada sampel regulator bertekanan rendah untuk tabung baja LPG yang diambil melalui survei pasar di beberapa kota yang mewakili provinsi Jawa Barat, Banten, dan DKI Jakarta.Uji unjuk kerja meliputi uji bunyi dan getaran, tekanan keluar, tekanan pengaman (lock up), ketahanan jatuh, dan uji kebocoran, sedangkan uji konstruksi yaitu uji pada bagian penyambung katup baja, saluran masuk dan saluran keluar.Hasil uji contoh produk regulator tekanan rendah untuk tabung baja LPG yang beredar di pasaran menunjukkan bahwa sekitar 37,5 % tidak memenuhi standar.Hasil uji tersebut juga menunjukan sekitar 18,8 % tidak memenuhi syarat mutu unjuk kerja dan 25% tidak memenuhi syarat kontruksi. Kata kunci
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".