MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134378804 · doi:10.31153/ppis.2020.83

KAJIAN PENERAPAN REGULATOR TEKANAN RENDAH BERDASARKAN SNI 7369:2012

2021· article· id· W3134378804 on OpenAlexaff
Gugum Gumilar, Rita Normalia

Bibliographic record

VenuePertemuan dan Presentasi Ilmiah Standardisasi · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegulatorChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The application of products standard is one of the Government's protective ways that aimed at providing benefits to businesses and consumers as a filter for quality goods/services before consumers make an issue of spending low-quality goods and / or services. This research is aiming to study the conformity of low pressure gas regulator which has been on the market to SNI 7369:2012. The mandatory SNI product testing has been carried out consisting of performance and construction tests on low pressure regulator samples of LPG steel tube that taked through market surveys in several cities representing provinces of West Java, Banten, and DKI Jakarta. Performance test with parameters: sound and vibration test, exit pressure, safety pressure, drop resistance, and leakage test, while construction test which is a test on the connector of the steel valve, inlet and outlet. The test results of low pressure gas regulators sampling products shows 37,5% does not meet the standards. The test results also showed that around 18.8% did not meet the performance quality requirements and 25% did not meet the construction requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePertemuan dan Presentasi Ilmiah StandardisasiSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207