MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134388852 · doi:10.1117/12.2577305

InAs/InP quantum dot coherent comb lasers and their applications in data centre and coherent communication systems

2021· article· en· W3134388852 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenguo Lü, Jiaren Liu, Linda Mao, Philip J. Poole, Eric Liu, John Weber, Chunying Song, Pedro Barrios, Martin Vachon, Shurui Wang, Daniel Poitras

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerabitWavelength-division multiplexingOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceLaserChannel spacingOpticsModulation (music)Semiconductor laser theoryElectronic engineeringComputer scienceWavelengthPhysicsSemiconductorEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next generation short and long reach communication networks would be required to provide data rates of multiterabit/ s. Such high line rates are not feasible using a single wavelength channel. However, the multi-terabit/s transmission capacity can be achieved by utilising highly parallel wavelength division multiplexing (WDM), with tens or hundreds of channels, in combination with spectrally efficient advanced modulation formats. Quantum dot (QD) coherent comb lasers (CCLs) are promising light sources for Terabit/s dense-WDM optical coherent and data center networks because such monolithic QD-CCLs solve the obvious cost, power consumption and packaging problems by replacing many separate lasers for each channel by only a single semiconductor laser. Other advantages include compact size, simple fabrication, and the ability for hybrid integration with silicon substrates. Recent years we have successfully developed InAs/InP QD CCLs with repetition rates from 10 GHz to 1000 GHz and a total output power up to 50 mW per facet at room temperature. In this paper we have presented the design, growth, fabrication, electronic control and packaging of the QD CCLs. The key technical specifications include L-I-V curves, optical and RF beating spectra, relative intensity noise and optical phase noise of each individual wavelength channel, as well as timing jitter are investigated. Data bandwidth transmission capacity of 5.376 Terabit/s and 10.8 Terabit/s in the PAM-4 and 16-QAM modulation formats are demonstrated by using a single QD CCL chip with a channel spacing of 34.2 GHz after 25 km and 100 km of single-mode fiber transmission lines, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207