MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134399752 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20200250

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 admitted to hospital and intensive care in the first phase of the pandemic in Canada: a national cohort study

2021· article· en· W3134399752 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Srinivas Murthy, Patrick Archambault, Anika Atique, François Martin Carrier, Matthew Pellan Cheng, Cassidy Codan, Nick Daneman, William Dechert, Sarah N. Douglas, Kirsten M. Fiest, Robert Fowler, Geraldine Goco, Yusing Gu, Anne‐Marie Guerguerian, Richard Hall, Jimmy Ming-Yang Hsu, Ari R. Joffe, Philippe Jouvet, Laurel Kelly, Michelle E. Kho, Rebecca Kruisselbrink, Deepali Kumar, Demetrios J. Kutsogiannis, François Lamontagne, Todd C. Lee, Kusum Menon, Heather K. O’Grady, Katie O’Hearn, Daniel Ovakim, Scott Pharand, Tyler Pitre, Riley Reel, Brenda Reeve, Oleksa Rewa, David J. Richardson, Asgar Rishu, Gyan Sandhu, Shirley Sarfo-Mensah, Ellen Shadowitz, Wendy Sligl, Joshua Solomon, Henry T. Stelfox, Ashleigh Swanson, Hubert Tessier-Grenier, Jennifer Tsang, G. Craig Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversité de MontréalSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcGill UniversityUniversité LavalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalBrantford Energy (Canada)Niagara Health SystemUniversity of British ColumbiaWilliam Osler Health SystemGrand River HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of AlbertaJoseph Brant HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill-Queen's University PressHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University Health CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaIsland HealthUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of TorontoCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineOttawa HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeIntensive care unitIntensive careCohortEmergency medicinePediatricsCohort studyRetrospective cohort studyPandemicIntensive care medicineDiseaseInternal medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Clinical data on patients admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) provide clinicians and public health officials with information to guide practice and policy. The aims of this study were to describe patients with COVID-19 admitted to hospital and intensive care, and to investigate predictors of outcome to characterize severe acute respiratory infection. METHODS: This observational cohort study used Canadian data from 32 selected hospitals included in a global multisite cohort between Jan. 24 and July 7, 2020. Adult and pediatric patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who received care in an intensive care unit (ICU) and a sampling of up to the first 60 patients receiving care on hospital wards were included. We performed descriptive analyses of characteristics, interventions and outcomes. The primary analyses examined in-hospital mortality, with secondary analyses of the length of hospital and ICU stay. RESULTS: Between January and July 2020, among 811 patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of COVID-19, the median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 53-75) years, 495 (61.0%) were men, 46 (5.7%) were health care workers, 9 (1.1%) were pregnant, 26 (3.2%) were younger than 18 years and 9 (1.1%) were younger than 5 years. The median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 7 (IQR 3-10) days. The most common symptoms on admission were fever, shortness of breath, cough and malaise. Diabetes, hypertension and cardiac, kidney and respiratory disease were the most common comorbidities. Among all patients, 328 received care in an ICU, admitted a median of 0 (IQR 0-1) days after hospital admission. Critically ill patients received treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation (88.8%), renal replacement therapy (14.9%) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (4.0%); 26.2% died. Among those receiving mechanical ventilation, 31.2% died. Age was an influential predictor of mortality (odds ratio per additional year of life 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.09). INTERPRETATION: Patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 commonly had fever, respiratory symptoms and comorbid conditions. Increasing age was associated with the development of critical illness and death; however, most critically ill patients in Canada, including those requiring mechanical ventilation, survived and were discharged from hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207