MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134443243 · doi:10.1049/cds2.12031

Adaptive data‐transition decision feedback equaliser with edge emphasis

2021· article· en· W3134443243 on OpenAlex
Yue Li, Fei Yuan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Circuits Devices & Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEqualiserBaudJitterBackplaneChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer hardwareTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adaptive data‐transition (DT) decision feedback equalisation (DFE) with edge‐emphasised (EE) taps is presented. DFE is performed when DT is detected using a loop‐unrolling algorithm. EE‐taps provide enhanced equalisation at the edges of data eyes, where the impact of channel impairment is most severe, and adequate equalisation between the edges and centre of data eyes to achieve both minimum jitter and maximum vertical eye‐opening of equalised data. Reference voltages for measuring the DFE error signal are adjusted to further improve the vertical eye‐opening of equalised data. The effectiveness of the proposed DFE is investigated using the simulation results of a 10 Gbps (gigabits per second) link over a backplane channel with −23.9 dB channel loss at the baud‐rate in TSMC 65 nm 1.2 V CMOS technology. Simulation results show that DT‐DFE with EE‐taps improves vertical eye‐opening by 3.9 times and lowers data jitter by 4.86 times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it