MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134446941 · doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.0c04212

Using Catalysts To Make Catalysts: Titanium-Catalyzed Hydroamination To Access <i>P,N</i>-Ligands for Assembling Catalysts in One Pot

2021· article· en· W3134446941 on OpenAlexafffund
Han Hao, Thibault Bagnol, Mathieu Pucheault, Laurel L. Schafer

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversité de BordeauxAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsHydroaminationChemistryProtonolysisCatalysisSteric effectsCombinatorial chemistryYield (engineering)MetathesisTitaniumTransition metalSalt metathesis reactionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a diamido-bis(amidate) titanium precatalyst, the hydroamination of alkynylphosphines afforded phosphinoenamine products. After reduction, 2-aminophosphines are prepared in excellent yield and on gram scale. A broad variety of alkynylphosphines and primary amines with different electronic and steric features are tolerated in this sequential transformation, enabling the rapid assembly of a collection of ligands. Additionally, intermediate phosphinoenamines can be used directly as proligands for coordination to transition metals using protonolysis or salt metathesis reactions. These transformations result in easy-to-use one pot protocols to prepare metal P, N -complexes for catalysis or small molecule activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic LettersSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207