MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134469893 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11251

Vanquishing the Victim: The Criminalization of HIV non-disclosure and transmission in Canada

2016· dissertation· en· W3134469893 on OpenAlexaffabout
Noreen Charge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsHIV Legal NetworkCarleton UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriminalizationCriminologyMoral panicHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Criminal codeCriminal lawPolitical scienceNarrativeLawPsychologyMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines the legal complexities surrounding the criminalization of HIV non-disclosure and transmission in Canada, where, by law, an HIV-positive person (PHA) is required to disclose his or her HIV status before engaging in sexual activities where a potential risk of exposure to the virus exists. In analyzing how HIV/AIDS is treated under the Criminal Code, the thesis will focus on the HIV narrative over the past three decades; the rationale behind HIV criminalization; how media coverage of HIV has incited bouts of moral panic in society; the historical legal framework; the evolution of HIV non-disclosure laws; how past precedents have affected cases heard to date; and, importantly, the role of public health and the consideration of human rights in relation to HIV criminalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207