A204 PATIENT FACTORS AND STONE FEATURES AS PROGNOSTIC PREDICTORS IN BILIARY STONE LITHOTRIPSY BY SINGLE-OPERATOR CHOLANGIOPANCREATOSCOPY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy (SOC) is a therapeutic modality for pancreaticobiliary stone disease that is refractory to traditional ERCP. SOC is still considered a relatively novel technology with limited access in many centers and significant associated costs. Thus, it is imperative to understand the influence patient-based factors and ancillary actions have on the outcome of SOC. Aims We hope to determine if the differences in clinical outcomes amongst cohorts suffice to indicate a re-evaluation of SOC in unfavourable patient populations. We present a series of patients who underwent SOC for biliary stone lithotripsy at a tertiary center with exploratory analysis of factors related to efficacy and adverse events. Methods This is a retrospective, descriptive case series. Cases were identified via query of the electronic medical record between March 2016 and May 2019. We evaluated patient demographics, past medical history, clinical presentation, disease characteristics, complication rates, and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results 25 unique patients underwent a total of 44 SOC procedures. Mean age was 68 (range 22–88). 13 patients were male. 29 procedures involved a stone in the Common Bile Duct (CBD), 5 in the Common Hepatic & Intrahepatic Ducts (CIHD), 4 in the Pancreatic Duct (PD) and 6 in the Cystic Duct (CD). Symptomatic improvement was achieved in 100% of patients. After a single session, 22.7% of procedures resulted in complete clearance and 59.1% of cases led to partial fragmentation. CBD stones however had an 86.2% clearance rate, compared to an 88–91% success rate in literature. The total complication rate was 16% across age and sex groups. The most common complication was bacteremia in 4 (9.1%) cases. Undifferentiated complication rates were highest with CD stones, while bacteremia was most likely with PD stones. A strong trend was noticed between past SOC procedures and increasing ongoing stone burden, with repeat SOC required less often in patient’s with fewer past SOC procedures. We further observed poorer fragmentation rates for PD stones and a rising trend for repeat SOCs for proximal CBD stones. Conclusions SOC is useful against difficult biliary stones and can provide therapeutic relief without theoretical risks associated with surgery and ERCP. While our study was underpowered to provide generalizable statistics, it is one of the few studies that showed the influence certain comorbidities, stone characteristics and age have on the efficacy and safety of SOC. Our data illustrates the relative effect location and stone-size has on fragmentation and complications rates. Poorer outcomes are more frequent in those with systemic comorbidities and previous surgeries, and rates of complications and failed fragmentation are further exacerbated by age. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".