A169 EXPLORING PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON AN ONLINE STRESS REDUCTION BASED WELLNESS INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Despite strong connections between stress and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) associated symptoms, there has been limited research on stress reduction interventions for patients with IBD. Moreover, the research that has been conducted on this topic has shown mixed results with very few studies having used qualitative methodology to explore the patient experience. Aims Our objectives for this study were to explore: (i) the experience of having IBD, (ii) the influence of an online 12-week stress reduction program on participant’s physical and emotional symptoms of IBD and (iii) the acceptability of the online program. Methods We used a qualitative descriptive approach embedded within a larger randomised control trial (RCT) to explore the experiences of participants. Upon completion of the program, participants were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed through an inductive process whereby transcripts were coded, with codes grouped into larger categories and then themes. Data collection and analysis occurred in a concurrent and iterative manner to enable refinement of interview questions and reflections on the research process. Results We analysed a total of 55 interviews. Three main themes emerged from the data: (i) IBD as a source of stress and uncertainty, (ii) understanding the positive impacts of the stress reduction program, and (iii) enhancing program desirability. Participants reported a reduction in IBD symptom burden with improvements in their ability to manage everyday and disease-associated stressors, while building a positive mindset. Weekly check-ins with program facilitators enabled participants to build routine, enhancing accountability. Variation in program content and fostering connections with others in the IBD community were identified as potential program improvements. Conclusions Our findings highlight the debilitating nature of IBD, with participants reporting significant disruptions to daily activities, uncertainty, and stress which served to worsen symptoms. Stress reduction programs like the one explored in our study offer an accessible avenue for reducing perceived stress, enhancing resilience and improving the physical condition of individuals diagnosed with IBD. Future research should explore the application of online stress reduction programs in patients experiencing other gastrointestinal disease. Funding Agencies CIHRUniversity Hospital Foundation, American College of Gastroenterology, CIHR IMAGINE grant
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".