Clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving radium-223 (Ra-223) early versus late in the treatment sequence.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
136 Background: Ra-223 is the only targeted alpha therapy shown to prolong overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC. The purpose of this real-world study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients (pts) when Ra-223 is used early (second-line) or late (third or later lines) for mCRPC. Methods: We used administrative databases in Ontario (2012-2017) to estimate OS from start of second-line life prolonging therapy (LPT), event free survival (EFS; time from start of second-line LPT to start of fourth-line or death) using counting process models, comparing 2 cohorts of patients: Early Ra-223 (2nd line) vs Late Ra-223 (3rd or later line). All models are adjusted for relevant fixed and time-varying covariates, including age, prostate specific antigen, hemoglobin, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), use of bone health agents, prior systemic treatments, Gleason score, TNM score, Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and standardized pain score. Results: Data from 598 men in Ontario with mCRPC who received at least 2 lines of LPT, including Ra-223 in second line or later were analyzed (Early Ra-223=253; 42.3%; Late Ra-223=345; 57.7%). The mean age (standard deviation) at the start of first-line LPT was 72.2 years (8.8). Patients in the early Ra-223 cohort had a longer time from diagnosis of prostate cancer to receiving first-line LPT, a longer time from start of first-line to start of second-line LPT, and were less likely to receive docetaxel. The median number of Ra-223 cycles was 5 (range 3-6) and 4 (range 3-6) and the mean number lines of total LPT was 2.7 ± 0.9 (2.0 - 7.0) and 3.8 ± 0.9 (3.0 - 7.0) in the early and late Ra-223 cohorts, respectively. OS was better in the Early Ra-223 cohort compared to the Late Ra-223 cohort (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.66-0.95). EFS was better in the Early Ra-223 cohort compared to the Late Ra-223 cohort (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.86). Time to first hospitalization and time to first emergency department visit was longer in the early Ra-223 cohort. Conclusions: Real-world data from Ontario, suggests that patients who received Ra-223 in second-line versus third-line or later had better outcomes. Patients who received Ra-223 early received less chemotherapy, but had better survival. The selection of patients who may benefit the most from Ra-223, and the optimal timing of the Ra-223 in the sequence of treatments, are being evaluated in a larger Canadian study including data from four Canadian provinces (REACTIVATE NCT04281147 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".