MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Task Offloading Decision in the Time Varying Channel

2021· article· en· W3134556557 on OpenAlexaff
Jinkyo Jeong, Il‐Min Kim, Daesik Hong

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSamsungNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsMarkov decision processReinforcement learningComputer scienceTask (project management)Markov processComputationChannel (broadcasting)Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Process (computing)Partially observable Markov decision processScheme (mathematics)Computation offloadingArtificial intelligenceMarkov modelReal-time computingMarkov chainMachine learningAlgorithmComputer networkEngineeringEdge computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a dynamic task offloading decision control scheme to minimize the total delay to execute computation task taking into account the time-varying channel. Specifically, we consider the practical task offloading process, where executing computation task is carried out over multiple channel coherence times. In order to make an accurate decision on the task offloading process performed over multiple channel coherence times, we utilize the model-free reinforcement learning, since environment dynamics of the system, channel transition probabilities, is challenging to estimate. We formulate a problem of minimizing the total delay of executing computation task based on a Markov decision process (MDP). In order to solve the MDP problem, we develop a model-free reinforcement learning algorithm. Simulation results show that our proposed scheme outperforms the conventional scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC)Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207