MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early surrogate measures for ablative therapies for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

2021· article· en· W3134581025 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Glicksman, Amar U. Kishan, Alan W. Katz, C.A. Mantz, Sean P. Collins, Donald B. Fuller, Liying Zhang, Andrew Loblaw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerCumulative incidenceAndrogen deprivation therapyPopulationUrologyBrachytherapyRadiation therapyProstateBiochemical recurrenceInternal medicineCancerIncidence (geometry)CohortOncologyNuclear medicineSurgeryProstatectomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

241 Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa), but there is a lack of early surrogate measures in this patient population treated with SBRT to guide clinicians and patients. We aim to explore the outcomes of IR-PCa patients treated with SBRT and to assess the role of PSA response at 4 years (4yPSARR) as an early surrogate measure given its encouraging results in patients treated with brachytherapy. Methods: Individual patient data from 6 institutions for 820 patients with IR-PCa treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2014 were analyzed. Cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence (defined by Phoenix criteria) was calculated using Nelson-Aalen estimates, and metastases-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Biochemical recurrence-free survival was analyzed according to 4yPSARR with groups dichotomized based on PSA < 0.4 ng/mL or >0.4 ng/mL and compared using Log-rank test. Results: 820 patients were included, including 549 (67%) with favorable intermediate and 271 (33%) with unfavorable intermediate risk disease defined by NCCN risk group classification. Median age at time of treatment was 70 years. The most common dose, fractionation and treatment schedule was 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the planning target volume delivered every other day. Androgen deprivation therapy was used in combination with SBRT in 9.2% of patients for a median duration of 3 months. Median follow-up was 5.9 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical recurrence was 7.9% at 5 years. Metastases-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years were 99.4% and 94.6%, respectively. Median 4yPSARR (n = 504) was 0.2 ng/mL. Biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with 4yPSARR < 0.4 ng/mL (n = 387) was 99.2%, and in patients with 4yPSARR >0.4 ng/mL (n = 117) was 81.5% at 5 years (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Prostate SBRT is an effective treatment modality in men with IR-PCa with at least comparable rates of biochemical failure and metastases compared to other standard treatment modalities in patients with IR-PCa. 4yPSARR may represent an early surrogate measure for use in this patient population treated with SBRT and should be included for further study in prospective SBRT trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→