MétaCan
← all works

Validity and Interinstrument Reliability of a Medical Grade Physical Activity Monitor in Older Adults

2021· article· en· 4 citations· W3134685310 on OpenAlex· 10.1123/jmpb.2019-0074

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Validity and reliability study of a physical activity monitor device in older adults; instrument validation for a clinical measure, not research methodology.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

It validates a physical-activity monitor for health measurement rather than studying research methods.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Instrument validity/reliability of a fitness monitor is assay-style measurement validation, not study of research methods.

Abstract

Wearable physical activity monitors are associated with an increase in user’s habitual physical activity levels. Most of the older adult population do not meet the national moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) recommendations and may benefit from being prescribed a physical activity monitor. The PiezoRx is a class one medical grade device that uses step rate thresholds to measure MVPA. The validity and reliability of the PiezoRx in measuring MVPA has yet to be determined in older persons. We assessed the validity and interinstrument reliability of the PiezoRx to measure steps and MVPA in older adults. Participants ( n = 19; 68.8 ± 2.3 years) wore an Omron HJ-320 pedometer, ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer, and four PiezoRx monitors during a five-stage treadmill walking protocol. The PiezoRx devices were set at moderate physical activity and vigorous physical activity step rate thresholds (steps per minute) of 100/120, 110/130, adjusted for height and adjusted for height + fitness. The PiezoRx exhibited a stronger correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient = .82) with manually counted steps than the ActiGraph (intraclass correlation coefficient = .53) and Omron (intraclass correlation coefficient = .54) and had a low absolute percentage error (3 ± 6%). The PiezoRx with moderate physical activity/vigorous physical activity step thresholds adjusted to 110/130 was strongly correlated to indirect calorimetry (0.84, p < .001) and best distinguished each walking stage as MVPA or not (sensitivity: 88%; specificity: 95%). The PiezoRx monitor is a valid and reliable measure of step count and MVPA among older adults. The device’s ability to measure MVPA in absolute terms was improved when step rate thresholds for moderate physical activity/vigorous physical activity were increased to 110/130 steps per minute in this population.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour
Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Acadia UniversityDalhousie University
Funders
Keywords
Intraclass correlationPedometerPhysical activityPhysical therapyTreadmillReliability (semiconductor)MedicineCriterion validityPopulationValidityPhysical fitnessPhysical medicine and rehabilitationConstruct validityPsychometrics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes