Proposed Modification for ADAS Damper to Eliminate Axial Force and Improve Seismic Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A variety of yielding dampers have been proposed with different materials and configurations and constructed for various structures to improve their seismic performance. ADAS dampers are considered as energy dissipation tools to experience uniform yielding according to their specific geometry. However, the damper cannot perform ideally in large deformations due to an unexpected tensile axial force. This axial force not only creates strain localization at the middle of X-shape plates but also with an unexpected increase in the level of damper force can impose damage to main members. This paper proposes a modified ADAS damper with a shape similar to ADAS dampers and boundary conditions similar to TADAS dampers. Given the geometry of the proposed damper, the generated axial force reaches the bracings through side plates instead of triangular plates, improving the operation of the damper. In order to design a suitable damper, an equation is suggested to determine the maximum shear stress by modeling the damper using the Abaqus program and parametric study. Other findings include the evaluation of the monotonic, hysteretic, and seismic performance of this damper. On one hand, the results show that the increase in force level in the nonlinear range is about 30% for MADAS damper, while it exceeds 150% for ADAS dampers. On the other hand, the maximum equivalent plastic strain in ADAS is twice that in the MADAS. In addition, the evaluations of monotonic, cyclic, and dynamic behaviors indicate that MADAS dampers have great energy dissipation in large deformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it