MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134820413 · doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3061976

Delay-Robust Nonlinear Control of Bounded-Input Telerobotic Systems With Synchronization Enhancement

2021· article· en· W3134820413 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Zakerimanesh, Mojtaba Sharifi, Mahdi Tavakoli

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TeleoperationRobustness (evolution)Settling timeBounded functionLyapunov functionNonlinear systemComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)Tracking errorController (irrigation)RobotControl engineeringMathematicsEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceStep responsePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter puts forward a novel controller for joint position tracking of bilateral teleoperation systems subjected simultaneously to time-varying communication delays and bounded actuation. Enhancing such systems' robustness to the larger time delays comes prevalently at the cost of increased settling time for position synchronization. To this end, we propose a general and refined form of nP+D controller that not only mitigates the trade-off between settling time of synchronization and magnitude of time-delay but also exhibits better transient error in position convergence. These advantages are brought along through using capped joint-velocity in the controller, which offers a blessing in disguise in our presented Lyapunov-based stability analysis and allows disposing of the limitation that was originally considered on the nonlinear function's amplitude in previous nP+D controllers. We have shown that by setting conditions on the controller parameters obtained from the analytical study, the closed-loop dynamics' asymptotic stability is ensured. The proposed controller's efficacy and outperformance are validated through numerical simulations and experimental evaluations on a bilateral teleoperation system with multi-DOF robots as the leader and follower.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Robotics and Automation LettersSame topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207