MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Metamorphic evolution of the Petersen Bay assemblage, Ellesmere Island: What can we learn about Pearya - Laurentia accretion?

2020· article· en· W3134828894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karolina Kośmińska, Jane A. Gilotti, William C. McClelland, Matthew A. Coble

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLaurentiaTerraneMetamorphic rockBiotiteKyaniteSchistMetamorphismBayGeochemistryPaleontologyOrdovicianQuartzTectonicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accretion of the Pearya terrane to the northern margin of Laurentia plays an important role in the paleogeographic reconstructions for the Arctic region. Earlier workers proposed a timing of its juxtaposition spanning from Late Silurian (Trettin, 1998) to Late Ordovician (Klaper 1992). In this study, we focus on the pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) evolution of the Petersen Bay assemblage. This subduction related unit crops out between the crystalline basement of Pearya and volcano-sedimentary sequence of Clements Markham fold belt. The highest grade rocks, garnet-kyanite-bearing schist (sample 17-66) and garnet-kyanite-staurolite garbenschiefer (sample 17-64) were selected for P-T studies and in-situ monazite U-Pb dating by sensitive high resolution ion microprobe. Thermodynamic modelling of sample 17-66 gives a P-T condition of 7.8-8.1 kbar and 590-610°C for garnet core formation, whereas a pseudosection calculated for the effective bulk composition indicates garnet rim growth at 8-9 kbar and 650-660°C. The QuiG Raman barometry coupled with Ti-in-biotite thermometry yield conditions of 6.5-7.5 kbar and 540-600°C for the garnet growth. The combination of QuiG barometry and Ti-in-biotite thermometry indicate garnet growth at 7.5-8 kbar and 500-550°C for the garbenschiefer sample. Monazite shows distinctive zonation and 2, up to 3, domains were recognized based on textures and X-ray microprobe maps. For the sample 17-66, Monazite-I forms inclusions within garnet rims or cores of bigger matrix grains. It defines a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 397±2 Ma (n=18, MSWD=1.6). Monazite-II occurs in the matrix and gives an age of 385±2 Ma (n=19, MSWD=1.5). Monazite-I from sample 17-64 yields a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 394±2 Ma (n=11, MSWD=0.6). Monazite-II defines the age of 388±2 Ma (n=7, MSWD=0.8). Monazite-III was distinct only in garbenschiefer. It yields a younger age of 374±6 Ma (n=6, MSWD=3.1). The P–T data coupled with monazite dating suggest a Middle Devonian metamorphism of the Petersen Bay assemblage under amphibolite facies conditions. These new results suggest that the juxtaposition of the Pearya terrane, Petersen Bay assemblage and the Clemens Markham fold belt is Middle Devonian or younger, i.e. much younger than previously thought. References Klaper E.M. 1992. The Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the northern edge of North America: A structural study of Northern Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago Tectonics, 11, 854–870. Trettin H.P. 1998. Pre-Carboniferous geology of the northern part of the Arctic Islands: Northern Heiberg Fold Belt, Clements Markham Fold Belt, and Pearya; northern Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere islands GSC Bulletin, 425, 401 p.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→