MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134906840 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2020/45938.14336

Study to Assess the Prescription Pattern and Quality of Life in Osteoarthritis Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital

2020· article· en· W3134906840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACObservational studyQuality of life (healthcare)Medical prescriptionPhysical therapyOsteoarthritisPharmacotherapyDiseaseInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis (OA) often called wear and tear arthritis is a chronic progressive musculoskeletal joint disease with multifactorial aetiology, affecting millions of people around the world. It is one of the leading causes of morbidity, having major impact on Quality of Life (QoL) of the patient with substantial economic and social burden. OA can have a negative impact on health related QoL and psychological well-being of the individual. Aim: To evaluate the prescribing trends of drugs in the management of OA in a tertiary care teaching hospital and to assess the effect of pharmacotherapy on QoL of OA patients in terms of subjective and functional status using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis index scale (WOMAC)-modified Centre for Rheumatic Disease (CRD) Pune version OA patients. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study conducted among the OA patients in Orthopaedic Department over the period of one year between November 2014-December 2015. Adult patients of either gender diagnosed with OA for minimum period of three months were enrolled for the study. Out of 285 eligible patients, drug therapy of 256 patients’ data were analysed and they were given treatment by the treating orthopaedician. All the patients were asked to personally complete the WOMAC index scale during their first visit. They were followed-up for one month of pharmacotherapy in order to assess change in the WOMAC index scale. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software 16.0 version. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 256 patients who completed the study, the most frequently prescribed drug class was NSAIDs (82.1%). Acelofenac with Paracetamol combination (117) and Diclofenac monotherapy (44) were most commonly prescribed. Statistically significant reduction in the WOMAC (pain, stiffness and physical function) score was observed in the follow-up visit when compared to first visit (p<0.0001) after one month of pharmacotherapy in patients taking Diclofenac and Aceclofenac with Paracetamol combination. Conclusion: This study highlighted the significant improvement in QoL and significant reduction in WOMAC scores with Aceclofenac-Paracetamol combination and Diclofenac monotherapy in OA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it