A234 EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF STOOL SUPERNATANTS FROM IBS PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS ON THE EXCITABILITY OF DRG NEURONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Abdominal pain is commonly described in chronic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but the underlying mechanisms are currently unclear. The stool metabolomic and microbiota profiles of IBS and healthy patients have shown distinct differences. Additionally, IBS stool supernatants have previously been demonstrated to induce hypersensitivity of nociceptive nerves in the ex vivo mouse colon, suggesting that mediators in the stool can sensitize nociceptors. However, the effects of healthy control (HC) or IBS patient stool supernatants on the excitability of DRG neurons have not been clarified. Aims To evaluate the effect of HC and IBS supernatant on DRG neurons. Methods HC (n=8 patients) or IBS (n=10 patients) stool was collected, dissolved and homogenized with bicarbonate-buffered Krebs solution at 37°C in a 1/10 dilution. DRG neurons from C57BL/6 mice were dissociated and incubated overnight with HC or IBS supernatant in a Krebs dissolution. Changes in DRG neuronal excitability were recorded using perforated patch-clamp techniques to measure the rheobase (amount of current needed to elicit an action potential). The effect of the IBS and HC stool supernatants on the resting membrane potential (RMP) was also recorded. Results Overnight incubations with supernatant of HC stool diluted in Krebs solution (n=28 neurons) did not significantly decrease the rheobase compared to control neurons (n=22) (62.7 ± 3.9 pA vs 64.2 ± 2.7 pA). In a parallel experiment, we evaluated the effect of IBS stool supernatants diluted in Krebs (n=52 neurons) and found that they significantly decreased the rheobase compared to the supernatant of HC diluted in Krebs and control neurons (52.3 ± 2.3; p<0.05). The data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Incubations with IBS supernatant decreased the RMP compared to HC supernatant (-42.6 ± 0.6 mV vs. -46.0 ± 0.9 mV; p<0.01), which was calculated with an unpaired t-test. Conclusions These findings suggest that mediators in IBS stool increase the excitability of DRG neurons compared to HC stool supernatant, and thus may contribute to pain signaling in IBS patients. Funding Agencies CIHR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".