A2 <i>KRT15+</i> TUMOR CELLS AS PUTATIVE CANCER STEM CELLS IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is a particularly deadly cancer with a 5-year survival rate of only 14% in Canada. Treatment resistance ascribed for at least 30% of the death. The acquisition of resistance to radio- and chemotherapy is mostly attributed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and their persistence following classical treatments. CSCs are a subpopulation of tumor cells with high self-renewal and multipotent capacity which amongst others contribute to tumor heterogeneity. Our previous work identified Krt15+ esophageal cells as a rare and long-lived subpopulation of basal cells with higher self-renewal and multipotent capacities than other basal cells. Furthermore, preliminary observations suggest that Krt15+ cells could act as the cell-of-origin for ESCC, the most prevalent type of esophageal cancer worldwide. Though, we still ignore the role of Krt15+ cells in later stages of esophageal cancer such as treatment resistance and if therefore, they could act as CSC. Aims Determine if Krt15+ cells act as CSCs in ESCC patients and if they could contribute to treatment resistance. Methods To do so, we used Krt15-CrePR1;R26mT/mG mice treated with the carcinogen 4 Nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) in their drinking water for 16 weeks to induce ESCC. Twelve weeks following the beginning of 4NQO treatment, we induced Cre recombination with RU486, a PR1 agonist, leading to GFP expression specifically in Krt15+ cells. Following 4NQO treatment, mice were put back on normal water for 8 to 12 weeks allowing tumors to grow. At euthanasia, esophageal tumor cells were FACS sorted to isolate Krt15+ (GFP+) and Krt15- (GFP-) cells, which were then grown as tumoroids. Results We first validated that 4NQO successfully induced the formation of esophageal lesions in our model, which comprises Krt15+ and Krt15- tumor cells. Tumoroids were then successfully derived from these FACS-sorted cell populations. We demonstrated the increase of CSC-like cells within Krt15+ tumoroids compared to Krt15- tumoroids by measuring the presence of CD44highCD24high cells, two well-known CSC markers, by flow cytometry. Interestingly, Krt15+ and Krt15- tumoroids are histologically distinct. As observed for normal cells, Krt15+ tumoroids appeared as more multipotent and heterogenous than Krt15- tumoroids. Furthermore, Krt15+ tumoroids display higher hyperplasia than Krt15- tumoroids suggesting that Krt15+ tumor cells are functionally distinct from Krt15- tumor cells. Conclusions Krt15+ tumoroids display higher CSC content and hyperplastic capacity suggesting their potential role in esophageal cancer. With this project, we aim to highlight the role of Krt15+ cells in treatment resistance and put forward new targets to overcome this deadly issue in ESCC patients. Funding Agencies CAGCanada research chair TIER 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".