MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135031883 · doi:10.1553/sunda2005ssii3

Local Analytic Solutions of the Generalized Dhombres Functional Equation I

2007· article· de· W3135031883 on OpenAlexaff
Ludwig Reich

Bibliographic record

VenueSitzungsberichte und Anzeiger · 2007
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsMathematicsPure mathematicsSpace (punctuation)CombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inhalt:G. KREIL: Die Schließung des Institus für Molekularbiologie in Salzburg – Vesuch einer Chronik; R. GÖD: Preliminary Note on a Stratiform Arsenopyrite Mineralization in Quartzphyllites, Pretul-Alpe, Styria, Austria; L. REICH – J. SMÍTAL – M. ŠTEFÁNKOVÁ: Local Analytic Solutions of the Generalized Dhombres Functional Equation I; R. A. ABDEL-BAKY: One-Parameter Closed Dual Spherical Motions and Holditch’s Theorem; B. J. GRUBER: Mathematical-Physical Properties of Musical Tone Systems; A. DUJELLA – I. GUSIĆ – R. F. TICHY –: On the Indecomposability of Polynomials; A. FLORIAN: On the Density of Packings of Spheres in Spherical 3-Space; O. GIERING: Erweiterung eines ebenen Kollinearitätsproblem; G. PIRSIC: A Small Taxonomy of Integration Node Sets; P. A. LESKY: Orthogonale Polynomlösungen von Differenzengleichungen vierter Ordnung; H. NARNHOFER: Josephson Junction Revisited; J. SCHWAIGER: More on Rootless Matrices

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSitzungsberichte und AnzeigerSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207