A66 GASTRIC HETEROTOPIA OF THE COLON IN A PATIENT WITH A POSITIVE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Gastric heterotopia (GH), indicates the presence of ectopic gastric tissue and is a rare entity outside of the small intestine. Abdominal pain and bleeding are described but most colonic GH is found incidentally. Aims We report a case of colonic GH found on routine screening colonoscopy. Methods Case report and review of the literature. Results Case Report: A 60-year-old woman with a history of alcohol use disorder, chronic Hepatitis C, and gastroesophageal reflux disease was referred for colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test. Remote colonoscopy was notable for a large tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia. The patient denied constitutional symptoms, change in bowel habits, or evidence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. No family history of colorectal cancer was reported. Complete blood count, renal function, electrolytes, and carcinoembryonic antigen were normal. At colonoscopy, a 2 cm sessile polyp (0-Is Paris classification) was identified with a normal vascular pattern, but unclassifiable pit pattern. Submucosal injection was suboptimal suggesting tethering. However, given the history of previous polypectomy and favorable endoscopic appearance, piecemeal resection was attempted and achieved fair results. Histology showed abundant pyloric-type glands with overlying foveolar epithelium (Figure 1). Endoscopic follow-up at 8 months confirmed complete resection. Literature Review GH is observed throughout the GI tract but is predominantly seen in the esophagus and duodenum. Colonic involvement is uncommon with only 12 cases reported. Despite the lack of epidemiological studies, there is a male predominance across all age groups. Pathogenesis is thought to be either congenital, with deposition as the stomach descends during embryogenesis, or acquired secondary to metaplasia following injury to normal intestinal mucosa. Presenting complaints may include altered bowel habits or haematochezia, but most lesions are detected incidentally on surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopic descriptions are diverse with variations in size (1-60mm), Paris classification (sessile or pedunculated), and appearance (erythematous patch, ulcer, or diverticulum). Endoscopic resection is recommended given association with bleeding but may be technically difficult due to submucosal involvement which may theoretically increase risk of complications such as perforation. Definitive diagnosis rests on histological examination. The risk of malignant transformation of GH in the colon is unknown with only two such cases reported. However, some propose the incidence of malignant change is underestimated as the growing tumor may eliminate the focus of heterotopic gastric mucosa. Conclusions GH in the colon is a rare entity with diverse endoscopic appearances and poorly understood natural history. Careful endoscopic resection is feasible in the absence of other high-risk endoscopic features. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".