The Effect of Strain Reversal during High Pressure Torsion on the Evolution of Microstructure and Hardness in Al-2.5wt% Mg alloy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work aims to investigate the effect of strain reversal during High Pressure Torsion (HPT) on the evolution of microstructure and hardness properties of Aluminium-Magnesium (Al-2.5%Mg) alloy. For this purpose, Al-2.5%Mg alloy was subjected to monotonically (CW) and strain reversal (CW-CCW) deformation by High Pressure Torsion (HPT). The samples were subjected to a series of rotations in monotonically and strain reversal deformation with same equivalent strains of 1, 4, 12, 24 and 60 under an applied load of 6 GPa and with 1 rpm under quasi-constrained conditions. It was observed that Al-2.5%Mg when subjected to different routes, follows same trend in the evolution of the ultrafine structure, i.e. initial recrystallized microstructure with large grain size throughout the disk, at low strain level sub grains with prominent LAGBs network inside the grains and ultimately at the higher strains ultrafine microstructure throughout the disk characterized by equiaxed grains separated by HAGBs. The only exception to this was observed in case of Al-2.5%Mg during high strains at the centre regions where the fraction of HAGBs was found strikingly less as compared to its counterpart during strain reversal deformation. Hardness homogeneity was not observed for Al-2.5%Mg where the hardness at the centre regions was observed to be lesser than the edge regions with exceptionally less hardness at centre for strain reversal specimens at higher strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".