A129 VIDEOCAPSULE ENDOSCOPY RETENTION: WHAT ARE THE RISK FACTORS?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The most feared complication of videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) is retention in the intestine. It is estimated to occur in 1.4% of cases but the risk factors are not well known. Aims To determine the prevalence of VCE retention at a tertiary care centre as well the associated risk factors. Methods Retrospective study between 2016 and 2019. All patients at a tertiary care centre undergoing VCE were recruited. The patients with an incomplete endoscopy report or who were unable to complete VCE were excluded. Clinical and endoscopic information was compiled from patients’ medical charts as well as the indications and results of the endoscopic procedure. VCE retention, evaluated by radiography or CT scan, was defined as persistence of the videocapsule in the gastrointestinal tract for ≥14 days or the need for an intervention for removal. Results In total, 126 patients underwent VCE (average age: 66±16, 52% female). There was 6% of patients with Crohn’s disease, and 40% of patients had a previous abdominal surgery. The indications for endoscopy were: iron deficient anemia (48%), gastrointestinal bleeding (32%), suspicion/follow up of IBD (10%), and other (11%). The VCE findings (n=146) were: angiodysplasia (30%), inflammation (30%), normal (20%), polyp (5%), and other (15%). 77% of results were not previously found by conventional endoscopy or imaging. The prevalence of VCE retention was 1.6%. The patient risk factors for retention were Crohn’s disease (OR 19.67; 95CI 1.09–354.11; p<0.05) and corticosteroid use in the previous 2 weeks (OR 19.67; 95CI 1.09–354.11; p<0.05). There was no risk of retention associated with ulcerative colitis, sex, abdominal surgery, or opioid use. The finding of stenosis on VCE was associated with an increased risk of retention (OR 123; 95% CI 4.11-3683.43; p<0.01). Conclusions VCE retention remains a rare complication. There is increased risk of retention in patients with known Crohn’s disease or recent use of corticosteroids. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".