Toponyms in IvE 672 and IvE 3080: interpreting collective action in honorific inscriptions from Ephesos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inhalt: Florens Felten, Claus Reinholdt, Eduard Pollhammer, Walter Gauss, Rudolfine Smetana, Ägina-Kolonna 2005. Vorbericht über die Grabungen des Fachbereichs Altertumswissenschaften / KLassische und Frühägäische Archäologie der Universität Salzburg; Alrecht Gerber, Gustav Adolf Deissmann (1866-1937) and the revival of archaeological excavations at Epesus after the first World War; Stefan Groh unter Mitarbeit von Volker Lindinger, Klaus Löcker, Wolfgang Neubauer und S. Sirri Seren, Neue Forschungen zur Stadtplanung in Ephesos; Angela Kalinowski, Toponyms in IvE 672 and IvE 3080: Interpreting collective action in honorific inscriptions from Ephesos; Andreas Konecny, Vasilios Aravantinos, Michael Boyd, Ron Marchese, Geophysik in Plataiai: Resultate der Kampagne 2005; Alice Landskron, Das ´Partherdenkmal´ von Ephesos. Ein Monument für die Antoninen; Pietro Militello, Minoische Tradition und mykenische Innovation: Wandbilder und Kultaktivitäten in Agia Triada in SM IIIA; Arzu Öztürk, Gudrun Styhler, Konservierung und Restaurierung im Theater von Ephesos: Die Restaurierung des Bühnengebäudes; Andrea M. Pülz, Birgit Bühler, Die Goldappliken aus dem Artemision von Ephesos. Studien zur Typologie und Technik; Christine Rogl, Ein hellenistischer Reliefbecher aus der attischen ´Werkstatt A´ im British Museum, London; Eugenio Russo, La presenza degli artefici greco-constantinopolitani a Roma nel VI secolo; Alexander Sokolicek, Johanna Auinger, Ein späthellenistisches Grabrelief aus der Nekropole am Ostabhang des Panayir Dag
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".