MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

11.2 A 26.5625-to-106.25Gb/s XSR SerDes with 1.55pJ/b Efficiency in 7nm CMOS

2021· article· en· W3135225077 on OpenAlexaff
Ravi Shivnaraine, Marcus van Ierssel, K. Farzan, Dominic DiClemente, G. Ng, Nanyan Wang, Javid Musayev, Gairik Dutta, Masumi Shibata, Arash Moradi, H. Vahedi, Manavi Farzad, Prabhnoor Kainth, Matt Yu, Nhat Nguyen, Jennifer Pham, Angus McLaren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMuscular Dystrophy Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerDesApplication-specific integrated circuitBandwidth (computing)CMOSComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing connectivity of devices in our daily lives has driven the need for higher bandwidth in network and data centers. Recently, we have seen the development of 112Gb/s SerDes, particularly for long-reach interfaces [1- 3]. In high-density switch ASICs, we see an increasing demand to improve both area efficiency (mm2/lane) and signaling efficiencies (pJ/b) [1- 6]. In a switch ASIC, keeping the SerDes power low translates into broader system power savings since additional power and cost for cooling can be limited or even avoided entirely. One path forward to achieve these important system gains is co-packaged optics (CPO) with an extra-short-reach (XSR) interface. In these applications the switch ASIC and optical engine are no more than 50mm apart which represents a total loss of approximately 10dB at 106.25Gb/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207