MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135259783 · doi:10.1002/epi4.12475

FDA safety warning on the cardiac effects of lamotrigine: An advisory from the Ad Hoc ILAE/AES Task Force

2021· article· en· W3135259783 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jacqueline A. French, Emilio Perucca, Josemir W. Sander, Lennart Bergfeldt, Michel Baulac, David S. Auerbach, Mark R. Keezer, Roland D. Thijs, Orrin Devinsky, David G. Vossler, Timothy E. Welty

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUCB PharmaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGreenwich BiosciencesZonMwOtsuka PharmaceuticalIdorsia PharmaceuticalsEpilepsiatutkimussäätiöEpilepsy FoundationSunovionH. Lundbeck A/SSavoy FoundationEpilepsy SocietyCanadian Frailty NetworkNational Science FoundationGW PharmaceuticalsFinding A Cure for Epilepsy and SeizuresSpringworks TherapeuticsMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeZynerba PharmaceuticalsSK Life SciencePfizerBiogenCenters for Disease Control and PreventionPTC TherapeuticsEisaiNational Institute of Mental HealthAmerican Epilepsy SocietyArvelle TherapeuticsZogenix
KeywordsMedicineSanderLibrary scienceFamily medicineEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE)/American Epilepsy Society (AES) Task Force on the cardiac effects of lamotrigine was convened in response to a recent addition to the lamotrigine label by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).1 Lamotrigine is the nonproprietary name for a medicine that is sold under its generic name and several brand names including Lamictal™. The present advisory is based on an assessment of currently available evidence. It is not intended to replace regulatory requirements nor is it intended to be an exhaustive review. Its purpose is to advise health care professionals worldwide on how to minimize cardiac safety risks associated with lamotrigine use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0260.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsia OpenSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207