Ambassadors' and Minsters' Roundtable - What are the Prospects for High-Level Coordination?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PETRAS: Our next panel consists of ambassadors and ministers roundtable, and their selection is "what are the prospects for high-level coordination in Canada and the United States?Our moderator for this panel is Consul General Joseph Comartin.He is the Consul General for Canada in Detroit, and he is a lawyer.He started out his practice in Windsor, Ontario, and then he decided to go into politics, and for 15 years, he was a member of the New Democratic Party in the House of Commons in Canada.He was --he got very strong support from the local union members with a seat in the House of Commons.He was reelected four times and was the opposition house leader from 2011 to 2012.He is now Consul General for Canada in Detroit, and he is going to introduce this panel and lead this discussion.Joe? CONSUL GENERAL COMARTIN: Thanks, Stephen.I have been joking about this cold, but I didn't get it when I was in Canada.I got it after I came to the United States, so I am blaming the United States for it, and that's because Windsor is south of Michigan, not north of Michigan or the United States as most or the rest of the continent is divided.Let me start by introducing our panelists, first with Ambassador Blanchard, James Blanchard.I have got to say I have a whole bunch of material on him, but the only thing that is really important is that he was the ambassador to Canada.Everything else doesn't hale by comparison.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".