MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135316725 · doi:10.1115/1.4049577

Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Novel Design for Flexible Light-Emitting Diode Signage Modules

2021· article· en· W3135316725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronic Packaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)Light-emitting diodeFabricationFinite element methodPrinted circuit boardEngineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringOptoelectronicsOpticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a new design architecture for mechanically flexible light-emitting diode (LED) signage modules for applications in digital advertising on curved surfaces. The new design comprises an array of commonly used rigid printed circuit boards (PCBs) but of smaller size with some spacing between them, which is encapsulated by a flexible substrate or potting material, instead of a large single rigid PCB in the entire LED module as in the case of conventional LED signage modules. Commonly used through-hole type red-green-blue (RGB) LEDs are considered. To demonstrate the design, manufacturing, and mechanical flexibility of the design, a prototype LED signage module with a typical industry standard size of 304 mm × 304 mm × 10 mm was designed and fabricated. Experimental testing and finite element simulations were conducted to analyze mechanical flexibility and internal stresses in the module. The results demonstrate that the new design provides flexible LED modules, without altering the conventional LED control system. It is shown that maximum stress occurs in the spacing between the PCBs and is small even for large module deflection. As the curvature of module deflection was decreased, the maximum stress increased, indicating an important design parameter for the module deflection. The proposed design architecture will enable both indoor and outdoor digital advertising using billboards on a wide range of curved surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it