MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135331743 · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2021.26438

The Mounting Opportunity Cost of Pivoting to COVID-19-Related Health Systems and Services Research

2021· editorial· en· W3135331743 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jason M. Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare policy · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakHealth servicesHealthcare systemBusinessVirologyComputer scienceMedicineHealth careEnvironmental healthEconomicsEconomic growthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 was wholly unexpected. However, someone or some agency should be concerned about the balance between the short-term and long-term priorities of health systems and services research; a number of chronic diseases, and cancer, are still responsible for far more deaths than COVID-19, and there is much valuable work to be done in other areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.122
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.122
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0160.010
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0300.055
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.538
GPT teacher head0.579
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare policySame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207