MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135378231 · doi:10.1117/12.2577076

High-speed three-dimensional surface measurement using band-limited illumination profilometry (BLIP)

2021· article· en· W3135378231 on OpenAlexaff
Cheng Jiang, Patrick Kilcullen, Xianglei Liu, Yingming Lai, T. Ozaki, Jinyang Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelProfilometerData acquisitionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionField of viewOpticsFrame rateVisualizationComputer graphics (images)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging by structured-light profilometry is currently driven by industrial needs, medical applications, and entertainment. However, the limitation of pattern projection speed has prevented the structured illumination to reach the kilohertz (kHz) level. The limited bandwidth of the data transmission has prevented the camera from streaming data continuously, which thus has brought difficulties in kHz-level image acquisition, processing, and display of 3D information during the occurrence of dynamic events (i.e., in real time). Besides, the tradeoff between the camera’s sensor readout rate and the activated pixel numbers has strained the existing methods from reaching a large field of view (FOV) at kilohertz (kHz)-level acquisition. To overcome these limitations, we have developed highspeed band-limited illumination profilometry (BLIP) in two configurations. The first configuration, employing a single camera with a CoaXPress interface (CI), enables real-time 3D surface information reconstruction at 1 kHz. The second configuration, employing two cameras with a CI, uses temporally interlaced acquisition (TIA) to improves the 3D imaging over 1000 frames per second on a field of view (FOV) of up to 180×130 mm<sup>2</sup> (corresponding to 1180×860 pixels) in captured images. We have demonstrated the systems’ performance by imaging various static and fast-moving 3D objects. CI-BLIP has been applied to fluid mechanics by imaging dynamics of a flag, which allowed observation of the wave propagation, gravity-induced phase mismatch, and asymmetric flapping motion. Meanwhile, TIA-BLIP has empowered the 3D visualization of glass vibration induced by sound. We expect BLIP systems to find diverse scientific and industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207