A150 INFLIXIMAB INDUCED EOSINOPHILIC PNEUMONITIS IN AN ADOLESCENT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Infliximab is used to induce and maintain remission of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Pulmonary abnormalities in IBD are rare, but comprise airway, parenchymal and interstitial lung complications. Pulmonary adverse effects reported after Infliximab include tuberculosis reactivation, invasive aspergillosis, interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary oedema and alveolar hemorrhage. Aims Four cases previously reported associate Infliximab to eosinophilic pneumonitis. However, this is the first in pediatrics. Methods Case report of an adolescent female with IBD and a rare adverse reaction to Infliximab Results Our patient was diagnosed with ulcerative pancolitis, Mayo 2, initially treated with 5-ASA. Five months into therapy she was switched to azathioprine and Infliximab (10mg/kg every 8 weeks) due to worsening disease. She attained and maintained clinical and biochemical remission for the next 1.5 years. Azathioprine was stopped at the patient’s request. One month later, she presented with cough and nasal congestion but was afebrile. Peripheral eosinophilia was noted. Salbutamol and steroid inhalers were started, without improvement. She was admitted to hospital due to progressive cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. Physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Pulmonary function test showed FVC of 69%, FEV1 of 45% with bronchodilator effect of 12% and a FEV1/FVC of 59. Her blood work showed eosinophilia (4.42 x109/L) and an elevated IgE (4596 ug/L). Serum-specific IgE for Aspergillus was positive; but skin testing was negative. An X-ray showed marked bilateral interstitial thickening in the mid and lower zones. Chest CT showed extensive bronchiectasis with bronchial mucous plugging. A bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) reported marked eosinophilia, negative for mycobacterium, bacterial and fungal growth. Other infectious and autoimmune etiologies were ruled out. She responded successfully to high-dose prednisone (50 mg/day). At discharge, symptoms had improved, and her pulmonary function tests were normal (FEV1 of 95% predicted and FEV1/FVC 84). Upon steroid taper, she relapsed in pulmonary symptoms, eosinophilia, as well as a flare of her IBD. Reinduction with steroids resolved her symptoms and eosinophilia. Due to her loss of response to Infliximab and pulmonary, she was switched to Vedolizumab with good response. After stopping Infliximab her lung function improved significantly (FVC of 96% predicted and FEV1 of 98% predicted) and has remained so. Peripheral eosinophilia dropped to 0.2 x109/L. Her IBD is currently in remission without any respiratory symptoms. Conclusions Eosinophilic pneumonitis can be a complication of Infliximab. Our patient had a delayed presentation of respiratory symptoms, 16 months after a satisfactory response to Infliximab. Although responsive to steroids, she ultimately needed to be switched to another immunosuppressive agent. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".