MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135509024 · doi:10.4038/sljch.v50i1.9407

Chest pain in paediatrics: single centre experience

2021· article· en· W3135509024 on OpenAlexaff
Suliman Almesned, Ali A. Alakhfash, Abdulrahman Almisnid, Fahad Almesned

Bibliographic record

VenueSri Lanka Journal of Child Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical journalSri lankaMedicineScopusTransparency (behavior)PublishingChild healthLibrary scienceFamily medicineMedical educationSouth asiaMEDLINEPolitical scienceLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Unlike in adults, chest pain in children is usually benign, although it can be a cause of anxiety to the child and family.Objective: Long term follow up of paediatric cases, referred to our clinic because of chest pain, since we started the paediatric cardiology service in PSCC-Qassim in 2006.Method: A retrospective review was done of all children referred with a complaint of chest pain to the paediatric cardiology service in PSCC-Qassim from 2006 to 2018. Data were collected from the department database. Families were contacted to find out about the child’s chest pain and any other medical problems.Results: Two hundred and forty two children were referred to our clinic for evaluation of chest pain from 2006. Of them 56% were girls. The mean age at referral was 9.1±2.4 years and the mean weight at referral was 30±12 kg. On initial presentation, only 6.6% patients reported that the chest pain had some relation to exercise. The commonest symptom was palpitation. On clinical examination, 20.6% patients had innocent murmurs. The electrocardiogram (ECG) was normal in 231 (95.4%) of the cases. Two hundred and nineteen (90.5%) cases had normal echocardiographic findings. There was no statistical significance between the presence of a murmur and abnormal echocardiographic findings. Follow up was done through telephone contact of families of cases seen in the clinic. The mean age at follow up was 12.8 ± 3.3 years. One hundred and ninety five (80.6%) stated that their children no longer have any chest pain. Forty eight (19.8%) reported that their children still had nonspecific chest pain that did not interfere with their day to day activities. Thirteen (5.4%) stated that their children had other medical problems like asthma, anaemia and hyperthyroidism. None of them reported sudden cardiac death in any of the children.Conclusions: In this study carried out in the paediatric cardiology service in PSCC-Qassim, chest pain in children was benign. Follow up reported no sudden cardiac deaths in any of our cases.Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 2021; 50(1): 83-86

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSri Lanka Journal of Child HealthSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207