MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3135530200 · doi:10.1186/s13041-021-00762-1

Ethosuximide inhibits acute histamine- and chloroquine-induced scratching behavior in mice

2021· article· en· W3135530200 on OpenAlexafffund
Vinícius M. Gadotti, Gerald W. Zamponi

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Brain · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsScratchingEthosuximideHistaminePsychopharmacologyHistamine antagonistsChloroquinePharmacologyMedicineNeurosciencePsychologyImmunologyEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have recently reported that the Cav3.2 T-type calcium channel which is well known for its key role in pain signalling, also mediates a critical function in the transmission of itch/pruritus. Here, we evaluated the effect of the clinically used anti-seizure medication ethosuximide, a well known inhibitor of T-type calcium channels, on male and female mice subjected to histaminergic- and non-histaminergic itch. When delivered intraperitoneally ethosuximide significantly reduced scratching behavior of mice of both sexes in response to subcutaneous injection of either histamine or chloroquine. When co-delivered subcutaneously together with either pruritogenic agent ethosuximide was also effective in inhibiting scratching responses in both male and female animals. Overall, our results are consistent with an important role of Cav3.2 T-type calcium channels in modulating histamine-dependent and histamine-independent itch transmission in the primary sensory pathway. Our findings also suggest that ethosuximide could be explored further as a possible therapeutic for the treatment of itch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular BrainSame topicPharmacological Effects of Natural CompoundsFrench-language works237,207