A142 TRENDS IN <i>HELICOBACTER PYLORI</i> TREATMENT AND CURE IN EDMONTON: 2015–2020
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection have changed significantly over time due to changes in resistance patterns. In 2016, the Toronto H. pylori consensus guidelines recommended treatment for 14 days. First-line therapies are concomitant therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) and clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole (CLAMET) or bismuth-based quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline, PBMT). Second and/or third line therapies are PBMT or PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin (PAL) and the fourth line PPI-amoxicillin-rifabutin (PAR) for 10 days. Aims To describe and compare the efficacy of current treatment regimens for H. pylori infection in Edmonton. Methods This retrospective study reviewed records of patients treated for H. pylori infection at the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH) in Edmonton, Alberta from January 1, 2015 - November 1, 2020. Diagnosis of H. pylori infection and test-of-cure were documented with a positive urea breath test, stool antigen test, histology on endoscopy, or positive culture. Patients who had no post-treatment testing were excluded. The per protocol efficacy of different regimens was calculated as well as cumulative success rates when given as 2nd, 3rd or 4th line therapy. Results Overall, 170 of 237 (71.7 %) confirmed H. pylori cases achieved cure. The majority were female (64%) and 113 (48%) were born outside of Canada. CLAMET initiated at UAH had the highest success rate 41/45 (91%), and in referred patients who were previously treated was successful as first-line therapy in 45/70 (64%). Overall success rate of regimens were as follows (Table 1): CLAMET 49/98 (50%), PBMT 45/114 (40%), PAL 33/99 (33%), and PAR 16/31 (51%). Alternative regimens were not successful 27/223 (12%). Cultures and resistance profiles were available for 53 cases that failed initial treatment. Resistance to clarithromycin (84%), metronidazole (48%), and levofloxacin (41%) was highly prevalent (Figure 1). Conclusions Test-of-cure is important to verify H. pylori eradication as antibiotic resistance is common to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin when prior treatments failed. These results support the H. pylori treatment regimens recommended by the Toronto consensus guidelines. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".