MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3135605614 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.176

A178 USTEKINUMAB FOLLOWING PRIMARY ANTI-TNF FAILURE AND SECONDARY LOSS OF RESPONSE TO VEDOLIZUMAB IN AN ADOLESCENT WITH ULCERATIVE PANCOLITIS

2021· article· en· W3135605614 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Entenmann, Anne M. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineInfliximabUstekinumabUlcerative colitisInternal medicineNatalizumabPrednisonePancolitisCalprotectinFaecal calprotectinFingolimodAdalimumabGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseImmunologyColonoscopyDiseaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Infliximab is, to date, the only biologic therapy approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) in paediatric patients. Although often effective, primary mechanistic failure is more common in UC than in luminal inflammatory paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD). Alternate pathway biologics, specifically vedolizumab (anti-α4β7 integrin) and ustekinumab (anti-interleukins 12/23) are increasingly used in adults with UC. Emerging data from head to head trials of biologics and network meta-analyses of placebo-controlled trial data are being used to guide choice and sequencing of therapeutic agents. Even among adults with UC data concerning combination biologics are very limited. Aims To report the outcomes of addition of ustekinumab to vedolizumab in a patient with steroid dependent colitis, previous primary non-response to infliximab and secondary loss of response to vedolizumab monotherapy. Methods Case report Results A 17 years old girl was hospitalized with acute severe colitis (PUCAI 85) developing as oral prednisone was tapered below 30 mg daily despite ongoing intensified vedolizumab therapy (300 mg q4 weekly) and per rectal steroids. First presentation 2 years earlier with UC pancolitis, responsive to oral prednisone, maintained on oral 5-ASA until first exacerbation 8 months later. Responsive then to IV steroids, but unable to maintain steroid-free remission despite intensified infliximab with therapeutic levels. Vedolizumab initiated in setting of primary mechanistic anti-TNF failure. Steroid-free clinical remission for 7 months of q 8 weekly dosing with normalization of fecal calprotectin (16, 115 µg/g) when symptoms recurred and persisted despite shortening of vedolizumab dosing interval to 4 weeks. Vedolizumab level 34 µg/mL. Symptomatic response to oral prednisone 40 mg, but unsustained with tapering. Hospitalized with up to 10 bloody stools per day, nocturnal stools, abdominal pain and anemia requiring blood transfusion. High doses of IV steroids were given with slow response. Colectomy refused by family. IV ustekinumab 390 mg given. Vedolizumab continued q 8 weekly in view of prior responsiveness. Ustekinumab subcutaneous maintenance therapy initiated at week 8 and continuing q 4 weekly (levels 3.3 mg/L). Oral prednisone tapered and discontinued. At 5 months post ustekinumab initiation, patient is in steroid-free clinical remission (PUCAI 0). Fecal calprotectin has declined from >1800 to 723 µg/g. Conclusions In this patient with UC and primary failure of anti-TNF, ustekinumab has demonstrated short-term efficacy in alleviating steroid-dependency. The contribution of continued vedolizumab, to which there had previously been secondary loss of response, is unknown. Nevertheless, the safety profile of vedolizumab allows it to be combined with other therapies in selected treatment-refractory patients. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→