A228 WHEN ASCITES & VARICEAL BLEEDING ARE NOT FROM CIRRHOSIS: A CASE OF MUTIPLE ARTERIOPORTAL FISTULAE CAUSING PORTAL HYPERTENSION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Portal hypertension is usually due to increased resistance from cirrhosis. However, pressures can also be elevated due to increased flow. Aims To describe a peculiar case of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Methods A case report and literature review was performed. Results A 47-year-old previously well man presented with a 6 month history of rapidly progressive weight loss, ascites and variceal bleed. Workup ruled out common causes of primary liver disease. Initial imaging demonstrated a heterogenous liver, splenomegaly, ascites, patent hepatic/portal veins and multiple poorly defined low-density hepatic lesions with the largest measuring 2.1 cm. Transient elastography was 7.3 kPa (F1-mild fibrosis). At transjugular liver biopsy, hepatic venogram ruled out Budd-Chiari and hepatic vein pressure gradient was normal at 3–4 mmHg. Histology unfortunately showed hemangioma. A percutaneous liver biopsy suggested nodular regenerative hyperplasia, minimal fibrosis and mild cholestasis. Given worsening ascites, hyponatremia and 7 months of rapidly progressive decline, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) was inserted. Intra-procedure, portal vein pressure was noted to be 51 mmHg, with a portosystemic gradient of 42 mmHg. Although numerous abdominal CT and MRI did not show AV shunting, ultrasound post-TIPSS showed hepatic pseudoaneurysms & arterioportal fistulae (APF). Direct angiogram showed numerous hepatic pseudoaneurysms and intrahepatic fistulae making embolization impossible. CT showed no evidence of pseudoaneurysms or fistulae outside of the liver. Workup for autoimmune rheumatological diseases and congenital telangiectatic syndromes were negative. Given the high pressures being directed through the new TIPSS, right heart failure is an ongoing concern. APF are rarely encountered causes of presinusoidal portal hypertension, with communications most commonly arising from the hepatic (65%) & splenic arteries (11%) & the portal vein. Causes include traumatic (28%), iatrogenic (16%), vascular/telangiectatic malformations (15%), tumors (15%), aneurysms (14%) & congenital disease. Endovascular embolization can be used to treat single lesions. In complex cases with mulitple APF, surgery and/or liver transplantation may be required. Conclusions We report a rare case of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension due to increased flow rather than increased resistance secondary to APF. Funding Agencies None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".